Shakespeare in love and Romeo and juliet Movie Review

Shakespeargon in hump and Romeo and juliet - Movie Review ExampleIn this way, Will-as he is referred to throughout the film-becomes less of a historical chassis and more of a literary character in his let right Stoppard has created a Romeo with wisdom, showing the consultation what might have happened to the tragic have intercoursers had they been less rash. Although Will is fresh faced and handsome like his counterpart, Romeo, he also has maturity and the ability to think things through. Essentially, although many parallels exist between the works, each positive and disconfirming turn of events in Shakespeare in Love speaks to responsibility and sacrifice for the greater good rather than the impulsiveness and selfishness of youth.In the original race, Romeo and Juliet, it is love at first site, with the two falling in love upon first showdown and marrying soon after. Although Romeo woos her with beautiful words, it is clear that attraction is rooted in the chemistry they fe el upon meeting more than anything else. Their families are locked in a perpetual feud and Juliet is betrothed to a nonher man, which makes their love forbidden. This of course makes the action more exciting but more complicated as well.When Romeo is banished for murder, Juliet concocts a plan to fake her own death but Romeo is never informed of it and kills himself in grief. Waking to find him dead, Juliet kills herself and their families are left to aim the fall out from their deaths. We are left to believe that they agree to restore peace among them.Shakespeare in Love, on the other hand, related the story of a young noble woman who falls in love first with Wills poetry, his ability to use words to paint pictures and invoke deep emotions. Many of these words are used within the film, creating a play within a play. Rather than create a signal parallel, wherein all of the elements follow a recognizable predetermined path based upon the play, Stoppard chooses to sprinkle these el ements throughout the action. The feud, for example, is non between the families of the lovers for example, but between two play houses-The uprise and The Curtain-and their playwrights-Marlowe and Shakespeare. However, the death of Marlowe and the shutting down of The Rose sparks a truce between the two houses. Will Shakespeare has a play. I have a theatre, (Stoppard) says the owner, Burbage, when he offers his stage to the now defunct players.Loss brings together these warring groups, just as it did in Romeo and Juliet that the lesson here is greater. When both children are dead, a truce serves only to prevent further bloodshed. It will not bring these children back nor allow them to enjoy the peace that their deaths have brought. It is a bittersweet victory. However, when the two play houses form a truce, they are both elevated beyond their previous quality, producing a play exemplary of the Queens approval and praise as integrity that is able to truly demonstrate love.This d iversion from the play serves to blend in the action forward by giving the play a stage, it provides everyone involved with some measure of success, and one could learn a lesson in cooperation-if they were so inclined-as neither party could have reaped the rewards on their own, our lovers Will and genus Viola included.Another parallel between the plays is the morning after the lovers have first consummated their love routine and are torn from each other by the quickly approaching